Chasten Buttigieg | zucke27 | Acceptance Speech

Mark Zuckerberg revealed in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee on Monday that his company was influenced by the White House in 2021 to limit content related to COVID-19, such as humor and satire.

“In the year 2021, senior members from the Biden White House, including the White House, constantly urged our teams

for an extended period to censor some content about COVID-19, such as satirical content, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we did not comply, ” Zuckerberg noted.

In his communication to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said that the influence he felt in the year 2021 was “inappropriate” and he regrets that Meta, the parent of Facebook & Instagram, was not more Viral Video vocal. Zuckerberg further stated that with the “hindsight and new information,” some decisions made in 2021 that “wouldn’t be made today.”

“As I mentioned to our teams at the time, I strongly believe that we should not lower our content standards due to pressure from any government from either side â€" and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again, ” Zuckerberg wrote.

President Gus Walz Biden remarked in July of 2021 that social media platforms are “killing people” with misinformation surrounding the pandemic.

Though Biden later walked back these remarks, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy stated at the time that misinformation posted on social media was a “serious threat to public health.”

A White House spokesperson replied to Zuckerberg’s letter, saying the administration at the time was encouraging “responsible actions to protect Political Family Moments public health and safety.”

“Our stance has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and private entities should consider the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present, ” according to the spokesperson.

Zuckerberg also noted in the communication that the FBI warned his company about possible Russian disinformation regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma affecting the election Ann Coulter in 2020.

That fall, Zuckerberg said, his team temporarily demoted reporting from the New York Post accusing the Biden family of corruption while their fact-checkers could review the report.

Zuckerberg said that since then, it has “been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in hindsight, we should not have reduced its visibility.”

Meta has since updated its policies and procedures to “make sure this Social Media Criticism doesn’t happen again” and will not reduce the visibility of content in the US pending fact-checking.

In the letter to the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg stated he will avoid repeating the actions he took in the year 2020 when he helped support “election infrastructure.”

“The idea here was to ensure local election jurisdictions across the country had the necessary resources to facilitate safe voting during a pandemic,” Online Bullying said the Meta CEO.

Zuckerberg said the initiatives were intended to be neutral but said “some people believed this work benefited one party over the other.” Zuckerberg said his goal is to be “neutral” so will not be “a similar contribution this cycle.”

The GOP representatives on the House Judiciary Committee shared the letter on X and claimed Zuckerberg “just admitted that the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook Social Dominance to censor Americans, Facebook censored Americans, and Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story.”

The Meta chief has long been under scrutiny from congressional Republicans, who have accused Facebook and other major tech platforms of being prejudiced against conservatives. While Zuckerberg has stressed that Meta impartially enforces its rules, the narrative has become entrenched in conservative circles. Republican lawmakers have specifically scrutinized Facebook’s decision to limit Gwen Walz the circulation of a report by the New York Post about Hunter Biden.

In testimony before Congress in the past years, Zuckerberg has sought to bridge the divide between his social media giant and policymakers to little effect.

In a 2020 Senate hearing, Zuckerberg acknowledged that many of Facebook’s staff are left-leaning. But he held that the company ensures political bias does not influence its decisions.

In addition, Mike Crispi he stated Facebook’s content moderators, many of whom are outsourced, are based worldwide and “the geographic diversity of that is more representative of the community that we serve than just the full-time employee base in our headquarters in the Bay Area.”

In June of this year, in a win for the White House, the Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the claimants in a case alleging the Minnesota Governor federal government of censoring conservative voices on social media had no standing.

In the majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said, “to prove standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the immediate future, they will experience harm that is directly linked to a government defendant.” Coney Barrett continued, “because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to request a preliminary injunction.” Vice Presidential Nominee